Re: Email addresses
by "Bryan Bateman" <batemanb(at)home.com>
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 05:38:15 -0000 |
To: |
"Brent" <brent(at)dogwoodshelties.net> |
Cc: |
<hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
dogwoodshelties |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
If you can code this is a good starting point.
http://www.microsoft.com/outlookdev/ol-a&sa.htm
Otherwise go to http://msdn.microsoft.com and do a search on the "Outlook
Object Model"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brent" <brent(at)dogwoodshelties.net>
To: <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 3:23 AM
Subject: Email addresses
> I'm trying to create a e-mail list and forward e-mail to everyone in the
> group. So far, no problem, but additionally I'd like that when the
program
> sends the e-mail that no one else can see who all is on the list in order
to
> protect the privacy of each person. Currently I'm using Microsoft Outlook
> for organizing my different e-mail accounts, calendar and contact
> information. When it sends e-mail to the groups I've created thus far
> everyone is listed. Is there a way to do this in Outlook? I know it's not
> exactly a HTML question but thought someone here in the group might know a
> way of sending e-mail to multiple people but have the recipients only see
> their own e-mail address. I'd like to stay with Outlook if at all
possible
> but I'm certain that like my WYSIWYG editor I'll be told how BAD Outlook
is!
> *laugh* Ok, bullet proof vest on....any ideas anyone?
>
> Brent
>
> --
> Brent & Sherri Chance
> Jonesboro, Arkansas
> http://www.dogwoodshelties.net/
> ~~~~~~~ Home of ~~~~~~~
> Dogwood Shetland Sheepdogs
> Second Chance Sheltie Rescue
> CH. Cataway's Patent Pending,"Penny" &
> Ch. T'HY'LA'S The Next Generation UDX,"Riker"
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org]On
> Behalf Of Kate Pollara
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 7:49 PM
> To: hwg-basics(at)hwg.org
> Subject: Re: frames compatibility
>
>
> so does this mean that once you get listed you can add frames pages?
> Kate Pollara
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Wilson" <webgooru(at)gte.net>
> To: <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>; "Lori Eldridge" <lorield(at)uswest.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:23 AM
> Subject: Re: frames compatibility
>
>
> > > Could someone please tell me which of the older browsers don't
> > > support frames? I'm trying to talk a client out of using them and I
> > > need some stats.
> >
> > Too many to mention, many early browsers were incapable. The real
problem
> > is with search engine spidering of the website.
> >
> > Besides making the website a lot more confusing to manage and raising
his
> > costs, he needs to know that some search engines cannot and will not
index
> > or spider this websight. See http://www.laisha.com/excite.html for
> > background. Excite & Lycos will not index frames. Infoseek has
trouble
> > with frames. There are probably more.
> >
> > When we first built our main website, we used frames and had a dickens
of
> a
> > time getting it registered. I found mention of the frames problem and
> > converted the website to non-frame and we started showing up almost
> > immediatly. Our personal experience shows this is not a myth, we proved
> it.
> >
> > Paul Wilson
> > webgooru(at)gte.net
> >
>
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA