Re: SSI

Blue,

I do not think they are "substandard" by any means.  I personally do not use
them anymore because for me using php is much easier, but it's not because I
consider them substandard - I just prefer php.

My $.02 worth,
Keith D Sellars
WebGraffix
www.webgraffix.com
"Making the Internet Easy"

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Blue Tapp Scheffer" <blue(at)bluesarthouse.com>
To: "HWG Basics" <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:31 AM
Subject: SSI


> (sorry if you receive this twice, I just noticed that I sent the first one
> out as HTML)
>
> Hi everyone ~
> I have just started working with a new host company for one of my accounts
> and when I asked him if his server was SSI enabled, he told me that using
> Server Side Includes is a substandard method.  What are everyone's
thoughts
> about this?  Is it true, and why and what method is preferable these days?
> I have been using Server Side Includes for sidebars, headers, footers, and
> other page elements for all of my larger websites for years and I love
them
> because they allow me to make sitewide changes quickly.  Feedback?
> TIA!
> ~ Blue
>
>
> Blue Tapp Scheffer
> Blue's ArtHouse Graphics & Web Design
> 705 North Florissant Road
> Ferguson, MO 63135
> (314) 839-0634
> fax: (314) 839-1557
> www.bluesarthouse.com
> blue(at)bluesarthouse.com
>
> "Time to get a web site!"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA