re: paid search engine placement ideas

by Complex <complex_hwg(at)yahoo.com>

 Date:  Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:14:57 -0800 (PST)
 To:  HWG Basics <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
  todo: View Thread, Original
About search engines:

Fuzzy wrote:
"You'll go to "Frizzy and Fuzzy's Search Thingy" to find your single 
widget
(and your really tasteless porn!)."

LOL. But wouldn't it make more sense for Yahoo to list Playboy.com AND
the tasteless porn? That way, they would make certain to keep the
viewers on _their_ page, instead of forcing the more enterprising users
to go to Frizzy & Fuzzy's Search Thingy to get single widgets and
tasteless porn. Of course, you'd then have to decide which companies
are big enough (e.g. Playboy.com) to charge, and which companies are
too small (e.g. ComplexCam.com, also listed as Camplex.com) and can get
listed for free or for less moola.

But I'm just a web geek. I'll pass that one off to the busines people.
However, if they don't pick up the ball, I predict doom and bankruptcy.

=====
Michael Greisman
Webmaster
Scanalytics, Inc.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA