Re: .htm vs. .html
by "Phil Babcock" <pbabcock(at)bgsgroup.com>
|
| Date: |
Wed, 07 Feb 2001 09:15:57 -0500 |
| To: |
"Barbara Money" <bmoney(at)naisp.net>, hwg-basics(at)hwg.org |
| References: |
naisp |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Well, who really types in the "index.htmX" part of a website anyways? I=
just type "www.yahoo.com" if that is the website I want, not=
"www.yahoo.com/index.htm"... or whatever...
phil.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 06/02/2001 at 7:08 PM Barbara Money wrote:
>When I was working at a small company doing minor web sites, the boss
>told me to save the main page as both index.html and index.htm. He said
>it was because someone might type in the web page address with the .htm
>extension, and get a 404 error. I did it, but I had all referring links
>to the home page going to the .html file, so if anyone bookmarked it,
>they'd always get the "correct" page. Is there a real point to doing
>this or not?
>
>Barbara Money
>The Essential Image
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.