Re: Best way to control font size?
by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
|
Date: |
Sat, 09 Sep 2000 15:45:24 -0400 |
To: |
<hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
In-Reply-To: |
bones |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 11:32 PM 9/8/00 -0500, JamesKB wrote:
>What are the thoughts on controlling font sizes??.... be it "absolute" i.e.
>"basefont=" then using percentages (font size="75%") or (font size="small")
>etc...... or relative... or what ever???
>using font size="##px".... etc.... etc....etc.... or ??
James,
Never being one short on willingness to share their views, here's mine . . .
It depends.
here are the guidelines I generally use regarding this issue . . .
<.BASEFONT> I love this venerable old tag, but it's toast under the 4.X
strict DTD. So that's out if you are writing new code.
I use a lot of <.font size="x"> now, but that's not a great way either,
because browser font preferences and relative values (<.h1>, <.h2> . . )
can scramble tightly laid-out pages.
The other relative values (<.font size="75%">) stink in tables - real bad.
Besides . . . I'm not so sure you can do a "font percent" legally anyway .
. . can you?
And Lordy, Lordy . . . <.font size="xxpx"> is a suckers bet for sure! Don't
use that.
Now, with those guidelines, you can easily imagine why I said "it depends".
It varies based on your needs as a designer.
HTH,
Fuzzy.
__________________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing.
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA