Re: FrontPage built vs HomeSite update
by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:02:09 -0500 |
To: |
ErthWlkr(at)aol.com, hwg-basics(at)hwg.org |
In-Reply-To: |
aol |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Jump on it.
How often do you get paid good money to do something wrong where know you
will not be held accountable?
*Enjoy* the job man, I'm jealous.
. . . obviously . . . just my opinion :-)
Oh, and don't worry about the extensions. Remember the *real* audience the
software was intended for - how complex can it be?
Fuzzy.
At 06:46 PM 11/22/00 EST, ErthWlkr(at)aol.com wrote:
>Hi Friends:
>
>I've been given an opportunity to quote on updating a site that was built
>entirely in FrontPage. They are looking for someone to use FrontPage to do
>the work as well as create a new area.
>
>Specifically, it sounds like a catalog-type site with roughly 300 pages. The
>new area to be created will be roughly 40 pages. There is also a search
>engine on the site.
>
>I've asked several people if I could do the updating using HomeSite rather
>than using FrontPage since I have no experience in FP. I've gotten back
>conflicting responses that range from "no problem" to "I wouldn't touch that
>with a ten foot piece of lumber..."
>
>Can the group here render an opinion? Is this a can of worms I should stay
>away from since there might be proprietary extensions to worry about?
>
>As always, thanks for any guidance and advice.... :-)
>
>- Jeff K.
>
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
Somedays it's just not worth chewing through the restraints...
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA