Re: XML?
by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
|
| Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2001 18:16:09 -0500 |
| To: |
Gregor Pirnaver <gregor.pirnaver(at)email.si>,
hwg-basics(at)hwg.org |
| References: |
canopy canopy2 |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 11:46 PM 1/9/01 +0100, Gregor Pirnaver wrote:
>> It is my humble opinion that the developments we have
>> been discussing are pretty much going to mandate browser
>> detect scripts and dynamically generated pages.
>
>Content is also a problem, is it not?
Actually, you can include anything you would like in a dynamically
generated page. Text, graphics, forms . . . the works.
But I think I see what you are really getting at:
A regular sized page of text viewed three or four words at a time could
well be ~agonizing~ if you are using the devise because you are in a hurry
and need the info now.
Which seems to me like the reason you would own/use this devise in the
first place. Well, if you discount the "novelty" defense for owning one :-)
Fuzzy.
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
Another year ends.
All targets met. All systems working. All customers satisfied.
All staff eagerly enthusiastic. All pigs fed and ready to fly.
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA