Re: Netscape & tables

by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>

Date:	Sat, 03 Feb 2001 18:05:09 -0500
To:	Dallasstar1992(at)aol.com, sathish(at)bramhan.com, optima(at)hot.ee
Cc:	hwg-basics(at)hwg.org
In-Reply-To:	aol
	todo: View Thread, Original

Hi Lisa,

I use a variation on your "inclusion" myself. It goes like this:

"I have written this site using valid HTML. It works in all browsers, even
NN6."

You should try it. 'beats sitting around in your flameproof suit waiting
for something to happen.

HTH,
Fuzzy.

At 05:11 PM 2/3/01 EST, Dallasstar1992(at)aol.com wrote:
> Actuall,ost of us on the advanced  list are trying NOT to design for NN6, I 
>explixitly state on my website:
> I have designed this site with IE4+ and Netscape 4+ up to 4.76 users in 
>mind, and Web TV. Due to technical problems with NN6, I do not design for
the 
>browser. Thanks for the visit! 
>Yes, I am applying my flame-proof suit!
>
>Lisa
>
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
If we're not supposed to eat late-night snacks, why is there a light in the
refrigerator?
------------------------------------------------------------------

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA