Re: HTML 4.01 Transitional vs. HTML 3.2 Final

by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>

Date:	Tue, 06 Feb 2001 16:53:41 -0500
To:	Ken Lanxner <klanxner(at)home.com>, hwg-basics(at)mail.hwg.org
References:	canopy
	todo: View Thread, Original

At 12:44 PM 2/6/01 -0800, Ken Lanxner wrote:
>On 2/6/04 at 06:52 AM, Captain F.M. O'Lary <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net> wrote:
>
>> Well. No. Actually it is the W3 specifically saying it really should
>> not be used that convinced me.
>
>Can you please provide a reference for that. Several weeks ago you
>posted the following page for approval.

Ken. it was the ugly page that started
the line length wars (seen Ted's scars?).

I'm afraid to post it again. Ted mig
ht give me some scars :-)

Fuzzy.
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
If we're not supposed to eat late-night snacks, why is there a light in the
refrigerator?
------------------------------------------------------------------

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA