Re: So which DOCTYPE should I use?
by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:35:25 -0500 |
To: |
Tamara Abbey <tamara(at)abbeyink.com>, Jay Smith <jay(at)JaySmith.com>, hwg-basics(at)mail.hwg.org |
References: |
JaySmith |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
I Love You Tamara !! You are as good as Gold.
Happy Valentines Day!
BTW, you hit the proverbial nail right on the proverbial head. My goodness,
if you are going to use a transitional DTD, that has ~got~ to be a Best
Bet. . . . IMHO.
Fuzzy.
At 06:34 PM 2/13/01 -0600, Tamara Abbey wrote:
>(oh Fuzzy, who will get here first??)
>
>Given a quick look of your specs, XHTML 1.0 trans since
>
>1) It is the transition of HTML 4.01 Strict to XML
>
>2) Trans since browsers have yet to fully support XHTML/XML
>
>3) XHTML requires proper nesting, well-formed documents and closed tags --
>all good habits to start practicing yesterday.
>
>FWIW,
>~Tamara
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
Copywight 2001 Elmer Fudd. All wights wesewved.
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA