Re: Anchor tags: what is the standard?

by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>

Date:	Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:36:50 -0500
To:	"Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>, "HWG Basics" <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
References:	canopy
	todo: View Thread, Original

At 04:46 PM 2/14/01 -0500, Darrell King wrote:
>why not &nbsp;...?


I guess when it get's right down to it - personal preference.

I learned that trick when there really was no such thing as &nbsp;
(according to the w3).

Fuzzy.








>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
>
>I think we can safely say by definition the below named
>*container* should
>indeed have something in it.
>
>Consider if you will for just a minute . . .
>
>A dot (.) colored as close as humanly possible (using Hex) so as
>to match
>the background of the page and sized using the font attribute to
>something
>like . . .  "-890,000". Now, using your very best WYSIWYG buttons,
>plaster
>that sucker up in the very corner of the page (if you want the
>anchor to be
>"top"), or where ever you want it.
>
>Stick it inside that anchor tag!
>
>Creative coding the old fashioned way !
>HTH,
>Fuzzy.
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
Copywight 2001 Elmer Fudd. All wights wesewved.
------------------------------------------------------------------

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA