Re: When a client insists on trouble
by "Jim H" <jim(at)haslam.com>
|
| Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2001 12:50:25 -0600 |
| To: |
bart(at)gigabee.com, hwg-basics(at)hwg.org |
| In-Reply-To: |
site5 |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Thank for your comments, Bart:
I have optimized all the images. Most are around 328X282 pixels.
So they aren't big, but they aren't small either. I have a combination
of both text and image links for the mouseovers, the client won't
budge on any of them when I have tried to suggest text only. I
discourage myself from using the "hover" option since it is browser
specific and not available on all browsers.
My main concern is in the contract...I'd hate to publish this page,
have visitors complain to client, then have the client pull the "it's in
your contract that you guaranty your work and how the page
functions" card on me and make my life nasty. I guess it works
and functions, just not at optimum speed.
Jim Haslam
On 28 Jul 2001, at 14:23, Bart Szyszka wrote:
> >I have a client that insists on javascript rollovers. Hey, no problem,
> >but they have at least 12 rollers on the page resulting in over 28
> >separate images that need to pre-load. The page seems like it
> >takes forever to come up. The clients governing board is insisting
> >on these rollovers.
>
> Is there any way you can reduce the size of these images? A lot
> of times if you decrease the number of colors in a GIF's palette you
> can significantly reduce its size without any really noticeable difference
> in quality. Another thing to consider is using text links where you give
> them a rollover effect using CSS (a:hover).
>
> --
> Bart Szyszka bart(at)gigabee.com ICQ:4982727
> GigaBee ...is here to save the Web!
> http://www.gigabee.com
>
>
>
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.