Re: Validation
by Tamara Abbey <tamara(at)abbeyink.com>
|
Date: |
Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:18:35 -0600 |
To: |
"Michael Lessar" <rfd246(at)bigfoot.com>, <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
In-Reply-To: |
enterprise |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 11:20 AM 2/2/01 -0500, Michael Lessar wrote:
>What benefit will I gain if I validate to XHTML vs HTML.
Michael,
Such a short question, but a whole can'o worms answers this will generate.
So, before the good Cap'n can jump on his soap box for HTML 3.2, I'm going
to preach XHTML
8-)
I don't think you will see many /immediate/ benefits from XHTML, primarily
it will put you in good shape for things to come. The web is not a static
environment, and as new methods of accessing information become more
readily available, XHTML will put you closer to taking advantage of those
new technologies. I understand there's a lot more being done with XHTML on
corporate intranets, but that's just what I've heard.
XHTML is HTML, but the X stands for eXtensible -- I sincerely believe that
X means I will one day write /one/ pretty page and then be able to deliver
that page to printers, hand-helds, desktops, televisions, and maybe even my
refrigerator (eeek, the magnets must go!).
XHTML also includes some handy little conventions that you may as well get
used to doing -- close /all/ tags, use lower-case (why lower instead of
upper? I don't know, but it is nice to choose one way all the time), and
make sure they are properly nested -- now there's something Fuzzy would
agree with -- are some good habits whether you validate to 3.2, 4.0, 4.01
or XHTML 1.0.
The W3C not only has recommendations for XHTML, but they are already
extending it -- XHTML Basic for example.
IMO, a huge drawback for XHTML is its reliance on Style Sheets -- certain
things like FONT FACE are gone. That means some early browser versions will
/not/ display your pages with all the pretty, defined styles in your style
sheets, but they *should* display.
But in reality -- who do you want to *read* your pages? If you are dealing
with an environment that simply will not upgrade its browser to v.4 or
better, then XHTML is pointless. If you are in a commercial environment
that will most likely expand it's web site, then XHTML would be my choice.
O.k., Cap'n -- your turn ...
;-)
Tamara
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA