RE: How to Turn Down a Client
by Ben Ocean <beno(at)cnw.com>
|
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jun 2000 03:08:47 -0700 |
To: |
Dennis Lapcewich <Dennis.Lapcewich(at)unisa.edu.au> |
Cc: |
hwg-basics(at)hwg.org |
In-Reply-To: |
|
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 04:50 PM 6/19/2000 +0930, you wrote:
>Your words. Not mine. I've sold, too. Never lied, never hyped, never
>cheated.
Excuse me. Would *somebody* be so kind as to show me where I said that I
subscribed to the philosophy of lying, cheating or hyping? Here is a stern
warning: all of you who are defaming me are guilty of libel. Do you want me
to sue? An apology from you all would be well advised!
>Had more customers than I could handle.
Me too.
> > Whose definition? Who gave you the right to be judge and jury?
>
>My opinion. I believe free speech is still a right.
Then state it as such.
> > Oh, so marketeers are equal to pornographers. I see...
>
>Again, your words. Reread my comment. I'm not equating one with the other.
No, of course not. They're just right next to each other. Here are your words:
<quote>
The first were the porn sites because fertile ground is always infiltrated
first by the lowest forms of life. Now we have the marketeers moving in.
</quote>
Sounds like a slam to me.
>Always do a reality check. I always check to see if what I am doing is
>fair, open, honest, and free of deception, lies, subterfuge, hype, etc,
Then quote me stating I subscribe to the business practices of which you
accuse me! You're guilty of libel!
> > You honestly don't believe I have my clients' best interests
> > at heart? You've got to be kidding, right?
> >
>
>Yes, you have your client's best interests at heart. Not so sure that
>applies to their customers, though.
Prove it, or I have more grounds against you for legal action.
BenO
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA