Re: heavily O.T. [was Net Solutions... let it rest in peace]

And speaking of thanking people privately....I was berated by someone a 
while ago for writing my thanks to the list.  Here is my question.  If more 
than a few people answer your question, are you then to send a thank you to 
5-10 or more people?  Even those who didn't help yet still answered?
That's one thought, my other thought, and an even more pertinent one is 
this.......to me it seems that the public "thank you" actually performs a 
service.  That being that others know the question is satisfactorily 
answered and needn't add more.  It also serves to let those with a similar 
question know that the answer(s) received "worked".
Just my take.

Susie



At 06:13 PM 5/21/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>I really like you. All of you.
>
>Having said, that, IMO this thread is getting too long and very OT.
>Maybe I am too foreign and too newbie to say that, but that's how I feel.
>
>We are reminded every week that we have to thank people privately for any
>help they have given us
>so as not to overload the subscribers' email. This kind of thread, has even
>more reason to be kept private.
>
>
>cristina
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org]On
> > Behalf Of Hugh Blair
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:40 PM
> > To: hwg-basics(at)hwg.org

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA