RE: HTML differences
by SSDand W <mwalker(at)CYBERNEX.NET>
|
| Date: |
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 17:05:25 -0400 |
| To: |
<hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
| Cc: |
<patti.gettinger(at)email.riverwood.com> |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Patti,
If the original site was written using Front Page, there may be something
throughout the site such as front page themes or some other fun stuff that
requires Front Page Extensions on the server.
If the quote is just to convert the existing site, and not redesign it, the
quote seems very high. If the quote does include a new design, you need to
figure out if it is worth it or not.
Good Luck,
Mike Walker
http://www.WalkerTek.com
mwalker(at)walkertek.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-basics(at)hwg.org]On
Behalf Of patti.gettinger(at)email.riverwood.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 2:51 PM
To: hwg-basics(at)hwg.org
Subject: HTML differences
My department created a new web site for our company using a PC-based web
authoring program. Now our MIS folks say they will have to completely
rewrite the HTML code (requiring 55 days to the tune of $25 grand) "to be
compatible" with the server. Both groups use HTML 4.0. How can this be?
HTML Guild: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Web Developer Association - IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.