Re: After the recent site theft...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Webmaster at WebWham" <webmaster(at)webwham.com>
To: "David Jemison" <pithon(at)shknet.com>; <webwham(at)fido.ca>
Cc: <hwg-business(at)hwg.org>

: True enough. I think the modification on the graphic has to be pretty
: extensive in order to remove the watermark (I could be wrong, since I have
: never tried it). It would be interesting to know if numerous format
: conversions would cause the watermark to degrade in quality...

I was just playing around with a Digimarc watermark last night.  I marked an
image that I will be using as a background and then decided that it was too
big.

When I reduced it by 75% or so, Paint Shop Pro (6.02--trial version) was
still recognizing that the image was marked, but reported that it was unable
to read it.  Of course the image was also GREATLY reduced in size and
quality in the process.  There may be flaws in the system, but for up to 99
images a year, it is free and seems as though it might be worth the price to
this hobbyist.

--
T. Floyd
admin(at)pineloft.com
http://pineloft.com

HTML: hwg-business mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA