RE: Web Log Statistics
by Moe Rubenzahl <moe(at)maxim-ic.com>
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:46:02 -0800 |
To: |
<hwg-business(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
ip160 |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
>We use WebTrends but are looking to move to HitList. WebTrends is WAY too
>slow. ... We've tried to run it for a week and it crashes
>the machine.
Same here -- Todd reported the shortcomings very well.
WebTrends has a good feature list and is easy to set up and run, easy
to customize. But for sizable logs, it's a performance hog, taking a
loooong time to run and even if you are looking at just a few items,
I understand that it still tears through the whooooole log and
createst the whooooole database. Large runs tend to crash it. You
need to give it tonnage of RAM.
Still -- after you get it customized as desired, you can devote a
whole PC to it for overnight runs, posting results to a web page, and
thereby get the job done. So the negatives are real but the product
is still workable -- more so for smaller sites than for large; and
more so for regular production runs than for ad hoc analysis.
HTML: hwg-business mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA