RE: Church Site Critique

Hi,

Stats: 56k, IE5, 800X600, high color.

Bad first:

1. EXTREMELY slow loading. If I was at this site for anything else than this
critique, I would have left before the second graphic was half loaded. Pics
are dark and hard to see.

2. Font isnt proper for the background.  ie very difficult to read and
strains the eyes.

3. Calander of events is not current, and that suggests the site is not
updated regularly.

4. Calander also does not have the bottom banner and copyright info
centered.

5. Bulletin looks scanned in ...very tiny text, and requires right
scrolling.

6. Pics of people on current happenings look blurry..like they were over
manipulated.

7. Background is not consistent throughout the site.  Breaks continuity.

8. Contact info doesnot allow clicking to send an email.

9. Seems like way too many graphics throughout the whole site.  More
content, less graphics.

10. Pet peeve...I hate clicking a link, waiting for a page to load and then
seeing no content, instead a coming soon sign.  deactivate the link if there
is no content to see.

11. Again Pics... Staff pics are blurry and look overmanipulated.


Good:

1. Bottom banner doesnt change everytime you go to a different page.

2. Fairly easy to get around.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hwg-critique(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-critique(at)hwg.org]On
> Behalf Of Heath272(at)aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 8:36 PM
> To: hwg-critique(at)hwg.org
> Subject: Church Site Critique
>
>
> Hi,
> The website URL below is a link to my church's website.  I was
> wondering if
> you could e-mail me anything comments, good or bad, about the
> website that you
> may have.  I did not do this site, but hopefully your comments
> will help to
> show the "right" people what needs to be done to the site.
> Please keep the
> comments clean...
> Here's the URL:
> http://www.frazerumc.org
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Heath
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA