Re: Critique of Fulbright pages

hi Cath
I found screen 2 to be the most professional looking one and it loaded very
quick the links I guess were not hooked up yet nice clean job.
Some advice cartoons do not belong on professional sites or commercial ones.
But that is only my suggestion others will do it. Also I think animation
belongs on personal pages not professional pages unless you are graphic
designer and you want to advertise your work
Good luck
robert1
-----Original Message-----
From: Cath White <cwhite(at)tinyonline.co.uk>
To: hwg-critique(at)hwg.org <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
Date: Sunday, October 17, 1999 2:42 PM
Subject: Critique of Fulbright pages


>Hello
>
>I've read through lots of other critiques (very helpful) and now feel brave
>enough to ask for feedback.  I'm redesigning my work's site for the benefit
>of work and also to fulfill the project requirement for a diploma course
>I'm taking.  I have done 4 different prototype home pages which I'd like
>some initial feedback for particularly on style as I have no training in
>graphic design.  None of the links work and the images are still rather
>rough and ready - I'm still learning how to do graphics.
>It's the 4 screen views in Assignment 2 at
>http://www.bbk.ac.uk/cems/students/zbzma9u/
>
>The Fulbright Commission is a non-profit organisation that administers the
>Fulbright scholarships and provides advice to individuals in the UK about
>study in the USA.  FYI the present site is at http://www.fulbright.co.uk
>
>Be gentle with me :)
>
>Cath White
>
>
>
>
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA