Re: Critique Request - REPOST

Elias,

>I'm not such a critical type as to make a useful reply to your questions,
>but I did go and take a look at your sites. I like the new better than the
>old. I did not check out the Online Applications, but then I'm using a
Win32
>machine.


If you're curious, please check them out.  They've just been pretty
thoroughly tested with Win32 machines, and we know how to get them working
when they act up on someone

>You have sized your displays with out much wiggle room. That is, I always
>had a 1/4 scroll top to bottom. I finally figured out that on my computer I
>moved my lower taskbar up one notch to be able to display more icons. I
>suspect that this may be a rather common thing for users to do, and perhaps
>you should do so also when designing your pages, just so that everything
>fits in better even when some bozo has his machine set up differently.


I'm guessing that you are probably using the standard browser setup (Menu
Bar, Toolbar with Text Labels, Address bar, each one one on its own line)
and running 800x600.  I tried it like that & I see what you mean.  Some
pages there's nothing I can do about (I have to give all of the info), but I
know I can at least make the home page fit without scrolling.

>I found your new site interesting, and I looked at more of it than I had at
>other peoples sites, so I guess it is going to work. I also like the fact
>that you got rid of that Java Application.


Thank you for taking the time to look at the site.  I only wish more people
could take the time to do so.

Mike E.

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA