Re: CRITIQUE: The Casual Snapper

> [1] Browser, Resolution, O/S, Connection, Display Size


IE 4.01, 800x600, Windows 95, 28.8, 15" Flatscreen

> [2] HTML


> [3] Graphics, Color, Layout, Navigation


I found that while the graphics in the gallery where large, they would have
been poorly presented had they been put into a lower quality of jpeg...  The
site would have lost a lot had the main purpose for it been keps low res.
All the colors and layout where almost perfect.  The only thing I would
suggest is that you center the table under the picture (keeping the contents
left justified) and make it smaller.  Also, put your copywright notice at
the very bottom and put a line break in between the notice, main text and
feeling of the moment.

> [4] Did you enjoy the site?


Very much so.  I rarely get past the first page of most sites.  Your site
had a very good selection of color and the wording was kept simplistic.  You
didn't over describe the pictures and let us form our own opinions of the
scenery without having your personal influence in the way of them.

> [5] If I added more images, would you return?


Yes.

> [6] Too much content? Too little? Was the content boring?


Just enuff..  any less would be too little and any more would be too much.
Boring.. Not if the Smokies are somthing your interested in.  Not too many
people would consider such beauty boring.

> [7] Too many images? Too little?


More...more...more!

> [8] If you could change 3 things, what would they be?


See question 3

> [9] What did you hate most? What did you like most?


See question 3

If I had my own personal award to give out... I would.  We need more sites
on the net like this that people can go to and see what another part of the
world looks like.

Well done!

Jim Howarth
http://www.multiboard.com/~jhowarth

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA