Re: Please critique new DRS site
by "Sebastian de Raadt" <sderaadt(at)clear.net.nz>
|
| Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 21:39:13 +1200 |
| To: |
"Dan Driscoll" <driscold(at)lahs.losalamos.k12.nm.us>, <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org> |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
>http://lahs.losalamos.k12.nm.us/~driscold
> Hey allz. I'm looking for HARSH critiques of my new personal site
>Dan's Random Stuff (DRS).
Hehe....
> *NOTE* The web server currently running on our machine is ...
>really flaky.
Yeah, one page - guitars - loaded only a few lines the first time I tried,
then the full page the second time.
I noticed the server is quite slow. I know my connection aint great - but
sites generally load faster than that.
Nonethless, I checked a few graphics, and they were quite nice and small.
A few other points:
There was an unclosed '</b' at bottom of about me page. There was nothing
after it, and all other pages seemed ok, so I assumed it was your server not
sending the full page.
None of the pages whose source I checked had a doctype [1].
In otherwork.htm, the tr's in the table had a 'height' attribute. This, I
beleive, is not valid and I am not sure whether it has an effect. When I
removed them, and saved it, it showed exactly the same.
Quickly glancing through the source I saw this at bottom:
</table>
</table>
It was at the bottom of every page. Either you have one end tag too many
here, or you haven't put the </td></tr> between them (to close the last cell
and row in the last table).
None of the image tags I checked had the ALT attribute set. It is a good
idea for those that have text-only browsers, or have images turned off - or
even while the image is loading there is some indication of what is coming.
If they are big, give the size too.
Lastly, and I say this for almost every site, the font is not set and
defaults (I think for most systems/browsers) to times roman, a serif font.
It would certainly improve your site (IMHO) if you set the font to a
sans-serif font, such as verdana, arial, helvetica and the generic
sans-serif.
My overall impression was a clean, simple site, no clutter to drown the
purpose. It was well laid out and had a strong consistency and continuity
throughout. The rollover menu makes the difference, IMO - it looks great :-)
There could have been a few photographs (I didn't get to the 3d imagery - my
connection was reset) to give some more colour and life, IMO.
Win95
MSIE4
600x800 res with 32bit colour
28.8 dialup from New Zealand
[1] Go to http://www.w3.org to try a few doctypes on for size. I beleive
they also have articles on why you should have a doctype.
A nice site!
Cheers
Sebastian
__________________________________
Sebastian de Raadt sderaadt(at)clear.net.nz
http://www.rh.steiner.school.nz/sebastian
"Never argue with a fool, people might not
know the difference"
__________________________________
HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmaster @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.