Re: critisise my site??

Well.. I personally like Coffee Cup HTML Editor...  I combine that with
Canvas and use the two together..  it seems to be working just fine.  Now i
could use Canvas solely to do my design.. and have in the past.. and seems
to work fine.. but it has its limitations too..    Just my little bit of
input :)

Woody
WEE Enterprises


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. George John" <georgedr(at)giasbg01.vsnl.net.in>
To: "Liz Bartlett" <khyri(at)idyllmtn.com>; <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>; "Katsuey"
<katsuey(at)katsuey.com>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: critisise my site??


> I agree with most of what you say. But FP provides such a lot of junk code
> that you have to edit in notepad to make it leaner and more satisfying
when
> you view source. DW cannot be compared to FP as it is far superior. One
> thing I feel designers should learn is some basic graphics skills in
> Photoshop or similar.
> IMHO
> George
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Katsuey" <katsuey(at)katsuey.com>
> To: "Liz Bartlett" <khyri(at)idyllmtn.com>; <hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 5:28 AM
> Subject: Re: critisise my site??
>
>
> > At 02:55 PM 10/16/2000 -0700, Liz Bartlett wrote:
> > >At 03:32 PM 10/16/00 -0700, amit wadhwa wrote:
> > > >anyone out there whos tried both fp2000, and dreamweaver?
> > > >ive been told dreamweaver scores better points than fp2000. and how
> many of
> > > >you would go for hand coding instead of using editors?
> >
> >
> > I have.  In fact, I continue to create sites in both editors.  I think
> it's
> > good to be able to work in more than one editor.  I disagree with those
> > that disparage FP2000 - it's a good program.  DW3 is also an excellent
> > editor - which feature for feature, I've learned to like a bit better
than
> > FP2000.  DW3 is a bit harder to pick up but it has some great features
and
> > in most cases you can do everything done in FP in DW - its just done
> > differently.  FP is the easier of the two to learn IMHO.
> >
> > DW3 is my editor of choice because of the ability to work in layers - to
> me
> > this allows better placement of items and is really great for sites
where
> > you aren't quite sure how you want to lay it out.  Working in layers you
> > can move things around and be a bit more creative.
> >
> > As far as hand coding, I will say that it stuns me how many "web
> designers"
> > don't read or write a pixel of HTML.  I think being able to adjust HTML
> > produced by WYSIWYG editors is critical to good design, but I think hand
> > coding when such good editors are available is akin to using a
typewriter
> > rather than a computer.  However, I understand that just as some writers
> > would never give up their typewriters, some designers won't give up
their
> > hand coding.  IMHO if you read and write HTML, with a good editor you
can
> > get all the benefits of hand coding but save yourself one heck of a lot
of
> > time.
> >
> >            ((( �.-���- ^~~ ^
> >             (         {>�Y�<}
> >              \     )_  `~-~/�
> >               \,,/,,/ \,,,�,,�
> >
> > Brown Holdings LLC Group
> > Katsuey's Legal Gateway
> > http://www.katsuey.com
> > KatsueyDesignWorks, Custom Web Design
> > http://www.katsueydesignworks.com
> > RGreatHosts, Hosting and Domain Name Purchasing
> > http://www.rgreathosts.com
> >
>
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA