Yeah, I would sign up for a list like that.  

phil.


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 20/01/2001 at 8:32 AM Sara Moulton wrote:

>I'm intrigued.  I agree that it isn't really what the techniques list=
 does.  I
>don't know of another hwg list that does this.  I've gotten many good=
 pointers
>from the critique group.  It would be very helpful to have a tester group,=
 too.
>I'm hesitant to keep using the same group of friends and relatives to test
>sites.  It would be nice to have an alternate group to use.
>
>
>Paul Mennega wrote:
>
>> That I thought this list would be best suited to answer.  I, along with=
 many
>> of you I am sure, design web pages for a living.  I find this list VERY
>> informative and helpful, as I may not critique many of the sites, but I
>> certainly take head to some of the other's comments.
>>
>> Now for the question:
>>
>> The Critique list is helpful in look & feel type issues, but it does not
>> really get into many 'testing' issues, as it shouldn't.  That, however=
 is
>> something I would cherish.  If I could submit my site to a group of web
>> developers(like this list), and then have some of these developers=
 follow up
>> and test the submitted site, I think that it could be extremely helpful.
>> What I am proposing is a sort of Testing mailing list.  Would any other
>> developers out there be interested in such a list, and would you become=
 a
>> member?
>>
>> Again, this is slightly OT, so thank you for your time/patience.  If a=
 list
>> like this already exists, please point me in the correct direction.
>>
>> Thank you, Paul Mennega
>> http://www.mennega.com

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA