Re: ParentsDownUnder

by Virginia Blalock <virginia(at)visionsnet.com>

Date:	Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:57:29 -0500
To:	<hwg-critique(at)hwg.org>
References:	zigzagnet
	todo: View Thread, Original

At 04:02 PM 7/28/00 +0200, Gerhard Sch=F6ning wrote:

> > Please critique my site www.parentsdownunder.co.nz
>
>
>I have to agree with David: hand-coded, validated=
 (http://validator.w3.org/,
>http://www.cast.org/bobby/) pages don't take so much download time (on slow
>connections)... and are rendering well in many browsers :-)

I viewed with NN 4.73 and there was a LARGE left/right scroll and the page=
=20
elements don't position themselves where they appear to need to go. In IE=20
it looks better but there is still a slight scroll(using 800x600 res). I=20
would assume there is one or more table tags that are not closed. IE is=20
forgiving of bad coding but Netscape isn't.

Virginia's Visions
http://www.visionsnet.com
virginia(at)visionsnet.com

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA