Assuming that all candidates are subscribed to this list by now I'd like to
ask some of you the following question:

For me the Guild is a place where members help one another by sharing
information therefore I measure each member's involvement with the
organization by their participation in the HWG mailing lists. The statistics
below show your postings to the HWG lists. Data was retrieved from the HWG
archives last Friday and also includes all postings to -ops - which, at
least for me, are not all that relevant.

Some of you never or almost never contributed to the mailing lists and since
you are not credited on the volunteers list I am also assuming you haven't
contributed to the Guild behind the screens either.

My question is: What do you Peter, Richard, Ed, Johnny and Tanya have to
offer? I'd also like to stress your (except for Peter) failure in submitting
Candidate Presentation making you total strangers to me.

Taking the above into consideration I cannot possibly take your candidatures
seriously. Why should I vote for you?

Harold A. Driscoll     1788
Gerald Oskoboiny      416
Tarik Dozier               360
Jimmie McWhirt         258
Demitrius                   142
Frederick J. Barnett      91
David Humphreys         55
Susan Duncan             46
Peter Knaggs                2
Richard Tuttle                2
Ed Pastelak                  0
Johnny Mo                    0
Tanya Spain                  0

/e

HWG: hwg-elections mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA