RE: Q to Peter, Richard, Ed, Johnny, Tanya

by Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg(at)idyllmtn.com>

Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 1998 11:25:43 -0800
To:	"bart(at)bgrafyx.com" <bart(at)bgrafyx.com>
Cc:	"'eva'" <eva(at)algonet.se>, "hwg-elections(at)hwg.org" <hwg-elections(at)hwg.org>, "kt96(at)bcs.org.uk" <kt96(at)bcs.org.uk>, "rtuttle(at)cet.com" <rtuttle(at)cet.com>, "ed(at)clarkston.com" <ed(at)clarkston.com>, "johnny(at)opus.autoroute.net" <johnny(at)opus.autoroute.net>, "tcspain(at)unccvm.uncc.edu" <tcspain(at)unccvm.uncc.edu>
In-Reply-To:	bgrafyx
	todo: View Thread, Original

At 12:56 p.m. 01/11/98 -0500, B. Szyszka wrote:
>I was /just/ thinking the same thing Eva mentioned. IMO, having an HWG GB
>who knows what contributing to the guild and getting responses from the
>members is very important. I wouldn't take a candidate who hasn't had
>any interactions with the members very seriously either.

On the other hand, I caution against voting _merely_ based on
volume.  The qualities that make a good list contributor may
not necessarily be the best qualities for running an organization.

--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn(at)hwg.org>
President, HTML Writers Guild
http://www.hwg.org/

HWG: hwg-elections mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA