RE: FrontPage 2000???

Well it will be very interesting to see what Dreamweaver 3 (final release)
is like and if it can retain its very high following.

Thats is if MS-FP2000 is all that you have described it to be?

One thing that I used to hate about FP was the dogmatic way it insisted that
there was only one browser (IE) one OS (Win) and one version of html
(MS-HTML ;>) etc.. in the world.  I hope they have fixed this very big
"feature" for the better.

Must admin the last FP I looked at was FP 98 and I really didn't like what I
saw.

Gary
radharc.

John mused about Front Page....
>
>     I have always hated FrontPage, until FP2000, to be completely honest
> with you. They really did an excellent Job in 2000 though. For
> instance, now
> HTML stays the way you put it, remember before they always changed your
> coding? It used to drive me nutz! There are just so many new features, and
> ironed out problems in FP2K, I really can't list all of them. I would
> suggest you go get the 45 day evaluation version, and see for yourself.
>     Funny thing, but when the pres. said that he wanted me to use
> FrontPage
> to do the web (he had some reason, which I forget now), I almost quit. I
> hate fp that much. We got FrontPage 98 (I think) and, as usual, I found it
> to be nothing but a big headache! I was about to tell them where
> to shove it
> (as a matter of fact, I told my boss, that if I have to use
> FrontPage 1 more
> day, I was going to go postal!) when I got my FrontPage 2000 Evaluation
> disk, and installed it. Man, that program is awesome!!! Just go to
> Microsoft's site and look at the added features and the stuff they have
> cleaned up from the previous version.... or just get the
> evaluation version.
>     I have used just about every web development program out there, and am
> very happy with FP2000.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: JoAnna Blanding-Koskinen <jmkoskinen(at)earthlink.net>
> To: John Vogel <johnvogel(at)computerwiz.net>
> Cc: Villano, Paul <VillanoP(at)usachcs-emh1.army.mil>;
> <hwg-graphics(at)mail.hwg.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 5:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [Kais PowerGoo & PhotoShop Questions]
>
>
> > Frontpage 2000? Really? I have been totally disappointed in
> Frontpage, so
> I
> > didn't look into the 2000. Instead I went to PageMill. I'm alot happier.
> Can you
> > give me some idea of how good 2000 is?
> > jmkoskinen
> >
> > John Vogel wrote:
> >
> > > I agree. See my last post about PhotoDraw 2000. It really IS the best
> > > product; it cost less then the "industry standard", it does much MORE
> then
> > > the "industry standard" and as an added bonus... it integrates with
> > > FrontPage 2000 (which is IMHO the best web building tool
> available). The
> > > more I use PD2K the more I value it. It used to be PSP but now it's
> > > definitely PD2K!
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Villano, Paul <VillanoP(at)usachcs-emh1.army.mil>
> > > To: <hwg-graphics(at)mail.hwg.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 12:40 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [Kais PowerGoo & PhotoShop Questions]
> > >
> > > > All well and good.  Except most of us don't get free
> software.  You've
> got
> > > > to PAY for PhotoShop.  A whole lot more than Paint Shop Pro.  And if
> the
> > > > only reason you have the pricier software is because it's
> the industry
> > > > standard, not because it's the best product, that's a problem.  The
> point
> > > of
> > > > the discussion (at least from my end) is an attempt to
> steer thinking
> > > toward
> > > > making the best product and the industry standard the same thing.
> > > >
> > > > "Today is the fuel that powers your tomorrows!"
> > > > - Paul Villano, US Army Chaplain Center and School ."For God and
> Country!"
> > > > villanop(at)usachcs-emh1.army.mil
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: JoAnna Blanding-Koskinen [mailto:jmkoskinen(at)earthlink.net]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 11:56 AM
> > > > To: Villano, Paul
> > > > Cc: John Vogel; hwg-graphics(at)mail.hwg.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Kais PowerGoo & PhotoShop Questions]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Either way, if Photoshop is the standard, there's nothing wrong with
> > > knowing
> > > > it, especially
> > > > if it has the features to that get the job done.
> > > > \
> > > > jmkoskinen (You gotta learn the rules before you can change 'em.)
> > > >
> >
>

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA