Re: New site
by "Mike Taylor" <lonewolf(at)one.net>
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:31:20 -0500 |
To: |
unlisted-recipients:;(at)mail.hwg.org (no To-header on input) |
Cc: |
<hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org>, <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
>
>However, a lot of programs still default to .htm for some reason. It'll
>work, but it's not "right" and looks unprofessional. Since most computers
>can handle more than 8.3, there's no reason why you shouldn't just save
>your files on your computer as *.html
How does using a certain file extension make a *file* look unprofessional?
What reason is there to add one extra character instead of just using HTM?
Answer: there's no reason at all. C'mon, this point is a bit silly. I'd
be interested in official documentation indicating "right" and "wrong" file
extensions because I doubt any exist.
Mike
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA