I have always hated FrontPage, until FP2000, to be completely honest
with you. They really did an excellent Job in 2000 though. For instance, now
HTML stays the way you put it, remember before they always changed your
coding? It used to drive me nutz! There are just so many new features, and
ironed out problems in FP2K, I really can't list all of them. I would
suggest you go get the 45 day evaluation version, and see for yourself.
    Funny thing, but when the pres. said that he wanted me to use FrontPage
to do the web (he had some reason, which I forget now), I almost quit. I
hate fp that much. We got FrontPage 98 (I think) and, as usual, I found it
to be nothing but a big headache! I was about to tell them where to shove it
(as a matter of fact, I told my boss, that if I have to use FrontPage 1 more
day, I was going to go postal!) when I got my FrontPage 2000 Evaluation
disk, and installed it. Man, that program is awesome!!! Just go to
Microsoft's site and look at the added features and the stuff they have
cleaned up from the previous version.... or just get the evaluation version.
    I have used just about every web development program out there, and am
very happy with FP2000.

----- Original Message -----
From: JoAnna Blanding-Koskinen <jmkoskinen(at)earthlink.net>
To: John Vogel <johnvogel(at)computerwiz.net>
Cc: Villano, Paul <VillanoP(at)usachcs-emh1.army.mil>;
<hwg-graphics(at)mail.hwg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Kais PowerGoo & PhotoShop Questions]


> Frontpage 2000? Really? I have been totally disappointed in Frontpage, so
I
> didn't look into the 2000. Instead I went to PageMill. I'm alot happier.
Can you
> give me some idea of how good 2000 is?
> jmkoskinen
>
> John Vogel wrote:
>
> > I agree. See my last post about PhotoDraw 2000. It really IS the best
> > product; it cost less then the "industry standard", it does much MORE
then
> > the "industry standard" and as an added bonus... it integrates with
> > FrontPage 2000 (which is IMHO the best web building tool available). The
> > more I use PD2K the more I value it. It used to be PSP but now it's
> > definitely PD2K!
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Villano, Paul <VillanoP(at)usachcs-emh1.army.mil>
> > To: <hwg-graphics(at)mail.hwg.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 12:40 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Kais PowerGoo & PhotoShop Questions]
> >
> > > All well and good.  Except most of us don't get free software.  You've
got
> > > to PAY for PhotoShop.  A whole lot more than Paint Shop Pro.  And if
the
> > > only reason you have the pricier software is because it's the industry
> > > standard, not because it's the best product, that's a problem.  The
point
> > of
> > > the discussion (at least from my end) is an attempt to steer thinking
> > toward
> > > making the best product and the industry standard the same thing.
> > >
> > > "Today is the fuel that powers your tomorrows!"
> > > - Paul Villano, US Army Chaplain Center and School ."For God and
Country!"
> > > villanop(at)usachcs-emh1.army.mil
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: JoAnna Blanding-Koskinen [mailto:jmkoskinen(at)earthlink.net]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 11:56 AM
> > > To: Villano, Paul
> > > Cc: John Vogel; hwg-graphics(at)mail.hwg.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Kais PowerGoo & PhotoShop Questions]
> > >
> > >
> > > Either way, if Photoshop is the standard, there's nothing wrong with
> > knowing
> > > it, especially
> > > if it has the features to that get the job done.
> > > \
> > > jmkoskinen (You gotta learn the rules before you can change 'em.)
> > >
>

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA