hwg-graphics archives | Jan 1999 | new search | results | previous | next |
Re: DJ Sci-Fiby "Kathy Siddall" <ksiddall(at)attcanada.net> |
|
I went to the site you suggested and it took nearly 30 seconds to download on a 56K modem connected at 33,600. Tons of Ram and memory. The site looks good but slow to view. ><true confession>. It takes real skill to do that - something I have not seen a lot >of in my surfing adventures so far. Take a look at http://www.joinhand.org/ >if you want to see a class site (no I didn't do it, but I would love to say >I did). > ><humour> >jeez, I thought killian played hard ball. 12 - 15 seconds max, eh! Do you >ever >kick back on weekends and let it out to 20? ></humour> > >But now seriously, this does bring up a favourite of mine. I know we all say >that we don't wait longer than x seconds for a site to load, but do we >really do >it? How strict is everybody about this. I know I usually wait longer if it >starts to look interesting, but it has got to be a good front page before I >go >inside a site. Sort of like I'll give you one page to interest me as opposed >to >you've got 15 seconds to impress me with what a quick loading site you've >got. > >- michael a > >Stephen K. Fisk wrote: > > My rule of thumb is if a site takes longer than 12-15 seconds to load >it may be great looking (and yours looks very good) but I won't be around to >see it. > >skf > >
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA