I have only had problems when the FrontPage extensions weren't installed
correctly. Found it easy to reinstall the extensions, and have had very
little problems with it. FrontPage takes care of all the directories and
such. Right now, on my computer at work, I have 3 virtual web sites running,
and haven't had a bit of problems administering them. I've used dreamweaver,
and personally I find it to be quite inferior. IT has some neat gadgets, but
all in all, it really isn't my cup of tea. When I edit web pages, I like to
be in charge of what is going on with the code. FP2000 let's me be
completely in charge of how everything looks. You not only have WYSIWYG but
you can also show the tags WITH the actual layout. This is something you
have to see, since it is hard to describe.


> I don't really have a good idea about the ease of FrontPage 2000.  From
> what I CAN see though, if you have the FrontPage extensions enabled on a
> server, you have a LOT more complications to deal with as far as
> different directories, etc.  If I am in error here, please correct me.
> I use DreamWeaver and have been very very pleased with it.  It does have
> a few limitations that require some manual editing, but overall, I would
> rate it fairly high.
>
> I cannot compare it honestly to PageMill or FrontPage since I do not
> have experience using these 2 programs.  Any comments to this are
> welcome.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Keith D. Sellars
> WebGraffix
> www.webgraffix.com
> email: Keith(at)WebGraffix.com
>

HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA