hwg-graphics archives | Jun 1999 | new search | results | previous | next |
Web careers, graphics and nasty rip off jobsters!by WSherratt(at)aol.com |
|
Gang, thanks so much for replying and giving opinions on my post. I will just cut and paste what I sent to our friend, mrs.Durham earlier regarding the working for free principle ---- I agree wholehearedtly, and it is NOT something I advocate, nor did I choose to work for free, without considerable thought and wrangling in my own head. Really I was glad to do the Ezio thing for no money (though I got lots of benefits I would gladly pay for anyway) because I needed the references and URL examples. I cannot prove to anyone my skills without a portfolio. If I had not helped out, Ezio would have had the poor merchandise site, I would have no references, no URL examples etc. In this particular instance, I think I did the right thing. The calls I get now are from people who have seen Ezios site and thought it wonderful (who have also fumlbed with frontpage and then seen what a real designer - not wishing to blow my own trumpet could do). Personal reccomendation is the key in this business at present. So when Ezio, or one of the others I did "free" for reccomends me, I am in far better place to sell services. Don't get me wrong I don't advocate the free approach, but remember, at the time (last July) I was fresh out of University and needing experience. I think I made the right choice, though as you quite rightly point out, it is not an easy one, nor are there any perfect answers...............(please dont hate me!!) ----------- I think that sums up my attitude rather well. As for having been ripped off a little, yes that happened too. I went to a firm who sell programs to recruitment agencies (written in VB) who wanted to put an online version of the thing up. Knowing little about the web they interviewed me (for a full time post there) asking how this would be done. keen to please I told them, no DHTML was not what they meant when they talked about having user inputs which then changed databases and page content, moreso it was CGI, in my opinion. I even answered how would they sell such a service to a business that was required by law to keep paper records of everything. I thought I did rather well. Boom. Nope - BUT my suggestions had been taken on. Nice!!! Also when I was attempting a masters degree I wanted to write the dissertation on Supermarkets business use of the Internet(my background is in marketing and business, NOT computing - which is why I guess I can see through alot of sillyness!!!). The supermarkets in question responded "No, we don't want to fund this research, but feel free to send us the results in three years". Thanks very much!! Vote of confidence eh? Two fingers to them I venture. Anyway I am just sharing this stuff with you guys. On the topic of BMP, RLE, GIF, JPEG, LOL,m ROFL and other such capital induced frenzies - I was a bit upset to hear that everything I had done on BMP was low end stuff. There was me thinking I was a whizz!!! Shhhhh - EPS from now on. Also does anyone else despise Adobe products? I do. I find them the Microsoft equivalent of graphics. Endless features I dont want, complicated and over spec'd programs. Go away - I will use PSP thanks, and UUlead products seem the way for me. Adobe the gigantic monolith of graphics, there is not enough abuse for them on this list! Nah I expect what is termed as "flames" to burn my Email in box with great flurry and spirit. Nice one Mr.Will
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA