Re: OT: extensions
by "Harold A. Driscoll" <harold(at)driscoll.chi.il.us>
|
| Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:08:18 -0500 |
| To: |
"Kathy" <ksiddall(at)attcanada.net> |
| Cc: |
<hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org> |
| References: |
aol |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 10:07 12-04-00 , Kathy wrote:
>I am remaking a site and many of the pages have an
>*.hte extension rather than *.asp or *.htm. What is .hte?
Once upon a time the industry followed the convention of using the file
name extension *.html for HTML files (content type text/html). This worked
well, avoided confusion for end users, and was portable across a wide
variety of platforms (including those afflicted by eight-dot-three dementia).
Alas, with the belated discovery of the Internet by the Redmond Kids, armed
with their widely-flaunted contempt for convention and standards, crude
corruptions of *.html such as *.htm were inflicted upon the user community.
Lacking any technical justification [spare me the blather about Windows
limitations, unless backed up with substantiative technical arguments]
perhaps the Antitrust Rulings shed some light (see
http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/).
Given the Babel excrement that the Redmond Rabble has engendered, many
(particularly Microsoft Minions) are fond of introducing even further
alphabet soup. For starters, I'd suggest looking at the Content-Type header
returned by such file. That will tell you if this is still another
variation on the theme of corruptions such as *.htm on one hand, or perhaps
some meaningful clue if it is something else.
Safe computing, /Harold
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Harold A. Driscoll mailto:Harold(at)Driscoll.Chi.IL.US
#include <std/disclaimer> http://Driscoll.Chi.IL.US
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.