Re: png vs gif
by Honeywebster(at)aol.com
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:46:17 EDT |
To: |
rjp(at)mail.tele.dk, hwg-graphics(at)hwg.org |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
.png is not supported on most browsers at this time, although "they" keep
saying it will be the format of the future .jpgs. So, it wouldn't be a good
idea to use it unless you know the only viewers you want to see it can get
the .png format.
If your software allows you to create .gifs then they are licensed for the
use of the format. You can use them.
When creating .jpgs there is compression involved. Even if you tell it to
leave it at 100% (compression not dimensions), my understanding is there is
still some compression happening. You have control over how much you want.
Sometimes you can't tell the difference on a computer screen between a jpeg
that has been compressed to 80% or 50% or 30%. Take your image and compress
it at different levels and look at them on your computer. You can even upload
them to a Web page if you want to look at them online (may look a bit
different). In Photoshop 5.5, you can compare different compressions in the
same dialog box. I don't know what program gimp is so I couldn't tell you how
it would work there. Do you have Photoshop?
Just in case you don't know, the rule of thumb is large blocks of color
and/or type should be a .gif and photos should be a .jpg. There are
exceptions at times.
-Janet
HWG: hwg-graphics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA