Re: MySQL base time?
by "Keith D Sellars" <Keith(at)webgraffix.com>
|
| Date: |
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:54:17 -0400 |
| To: |
"Rajnish Bhaskar" <r.bhaskar(at)compserv.gla.ac.uk> |
| Cc: |
<hwg-languages(at)hwg.org> |
| References: |
localhost |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
That makes a lot of sense actually. I think you are right, because I've
always understood the epoch date to be the same thing on either server type.
Thanks,
Keith D Sellars
WebGraffix
www.webgraffix.com
"Making database sites seem easy"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rajnish Bhaskar" <r.bhaskar(at)compserv.gla.ac.uk>
To: "Keith D Sellars" <Keith(at)webgraffix.com>; "Keith D Sellars"
<Keith(at)webgraffix.com>
Cc: <hwg-languages(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: MySQL base time?
> Hi Keith,
>
> > Note: The valid range of a timestamp is typically from Fri, 13 Dec
> > 1901 20:45:54 GMT to Tue, 19 Jan 2038 03:14:07 GMT. (These are the
> > dates that correspond to the minimum and maximum values for a 32-bit
> > signed integer). On windows this range is limited from 01-01-1970 to
> > 19-01-2038.
>
> Hmm, I didn't see that (but then, I wasn't looking too closely :o)
> ). Thinking about it, it's very possible (and probably, actually)
> that the epoch value is still 1/1/1970 on Unix, but you get the
> earlier dates by having negative numbers.
>
> Raj.
>
>
HWG: hwg-languages mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.