Re: .htm versus .html
by "John Vogel" <johnvogel(at)computerwiz.net>
|
| Date: |
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 16:50:51 -0500 |
| To: |
"HWG Style" <hwg-style(at)hwg.org>, "Kevin W. Bishop" <bishopk(at)rpi.edu> |
| References: |
rpi |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Actually the W3C does NOT say. The only reason the .htm is around is because
of the 8.3 filename standard, for older ancient systems. I would just use
whatever you like.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin W. Bishop <bishopk(at)rpi.edu>
To: HWG Style <hwg-style(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 1:38 PM
Subject: .htm versus .html
>
> Please pardon me for posing a question not strictly related to style
sheets.
>
> What does the W3C say about the abbreviated extension .htm versus the full
> .html? I'm having difficulties finding anything useful at www.w3.org.
>
> In my experience, the former didn't arise without the "help" of authoring
> types of software.
>
> Thanks,
> -kb
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________
> Kevin W. Bishop
> Libraries and Information Services
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> <bishopk(at)rpi.edu> | <http://www.rpi.edu/rpinfo/>
>
HWG hwg-style mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.