Re: HWG link colours
by "Lois Wakeman" <lois(at)lois.co.uk>
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:49:17 -0000 |
To: |
<hwg-style(at)mail.hwg.org>, <sales(at)webalchemy.on.ca> |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Jeff,
For a start, leave out the vlink attribute of body (which is invalid anyway
as the # is missing). Then make sure your link pseudo-classes are defined in
the right order. That is, link, visited, hover, active:
>in my body tag I have left all tags unchanged and set vlink="CC9933"
>in stylesheet:
>a:active { color: #FFCC00; text-decoration: underline}
>a:hover { color: #FFCC00; text-decoration: underline}
>a:link { color: #CC9933; text-decoration: underline}
>a:visited { text-decoration: underline;}
and that you use the right syntax for a class with a pseudo-class:
selector.class:pseudo-class { property: value }
- compare a.botlinks:whatever with your code:
>a:botlinks.active { color: #FFCC00; text-decoration: underline}
>a:botlinks.hover { color: #FFCC00; text-decoration: underline}
>.a:botlinks.link { color: #000000; text-decoration: underline}
>.a:visited.botlinks { color: #000000; text-decoration: underline;}
I suggest you might try using the W3C's jigsaw CSS validator to trap errors
like that if you can't justify buying TopStyle or similar.
Lois Wakeman
------------------------------------------------------
http://lois.co.uk
http://siteusability.com
http://communicationarts.co.uk
------------------------------------------------------
HWG hwg-style mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA