RE: Another Dumb Tags Issue
by "tim booker" <timbooker(at)btinternet.com>
|
| Date: |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:48:37 +0100 |
| To: |
"'Tamara'" <tamara(at)abbeyink.com> |
| Cc: |
"HWG \(E-mail\)" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
| In-Reply-To: |
abbeyink |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Of course,
A feature like smart tags WOULD be useful if you could specify, for example,
that you want to search Google for the underlined word.
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> [mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org]On Behalf Of Tamara
> Sent: 14 June 2001 20:31
> To: hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> Subject: Re: Another Dumb Tags Issue
>
>
> At 08:46 AM 6/14/2001 -0500, bryan.westbrook(at)amd.com wrote:
> >[snip]
> >All MS had to do to avoid this PR nightmare is to have
> established a meta
> >tag to turn the #$%&!@ things on instead of off.
>
> Actually, that would be nice, but wouldn't it be sort of
> counter-productive
> in their business model?
>
> No, I'm not liking it either, not one little bit.
>
> <tamara />
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA