Re: Irritating (somewhat OT)
by "Aline Parrone" <larlina(at)mozcom.com>
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jun 2000 11:28:22 +0800 |
To: |
<martyh(at)cinci.rr.com>, <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
rr |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
thanks for this. really helps! also, my interest has been piqued about
Homesite. yes, maybe one of these days when i have the time, i will take a
look at it.
thanks again people!
aline
http://www.banahawbreeze.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin T. Hugo <martyh(at)cinci.rr.com>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2000 7:12 AM
Subject: RE: Irritating (somewhat OT)
> The shims are there to make the number of rows/columns line up
> geometrically. The only way to avoid them is to make all your graphics
the
> right size to fit in a rectangular geometric pattern. Its not "bad
coding",
> or "amateurish", its a mathematical requirement. A table is, by
definition,
> a rectangle; graphics placed pixel-specific on a layer do not fit into a
> geometric rectangular pattern, its as simple as that (bearing in mind that
> the size of the graphics are pre-determined by the graphics program that
> they were made in).
>
> Dreamweaver is a great tool, the only other way to convert layers to
tables
> that I know of is to merge them all into one large graphic and slice them
> with a slicing tool. The alternative of course is to start with a table
in
> the first place and not use layers at all.
>
> There are many ways to skin a cat but then, there are many ways to paint a
> barn too. Why use a 2" paintbrush when you can use a Wagner! (sorry,
> feeling analogous today).
>
> Marty
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA