Re: back to no-margins vs. clean code
by "Angel One" <angelone(at)angelonearth.net>
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2002 22:05:01 -0400 |
To: |
"HWG list" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
noteworthydesigns |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Hi Karen,
So: you're / we're stuck with either using code that works or code that
validates. I'll take code that works. At least my sites look good (& are
fully functional) for everyone.
As for the Yahoo-Google thing, I believe you'll find that using the Open
Directory (dmoz.org) will get you listed in both. Personally I hate Google
with it's re-directed re-opening of the page, which results in going back to
the # 1 listing page tter what # listing you have gone forward to. When
searching, I go to DMOZ first, then Yahoo, then *maybe* Google & then
others.
My 2 cents....
~ Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noteworthy Web Designs" <webmaster(at)noteworthydesigns.com>
To: "HWG Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:18 PM
Subject: back to no-margins vs. clean code
> OK, I've made a CSS change at www.waxstation.com for no margins, and it
> looks great in IE, but in Netscape 4.7 and Opera, it's not really what I
> want. I need an opinion, since it's likely that Yahoo editors use
> Netscape 4.7 (and I DON'T want a discussions on the virtues or lack of
> for Yahoo!) What do you all think? I wish I could go back to the no
> margins code:-) It worked in all my browsers.
>
> --
> Karen Stafford
> Noteworthy Web Designs
> "Websites Composed with Jazz"
> Web Design,Hosting,Search Promotion
> http://www.noteworthydesigns.com
>
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA