Re: fonts
by "Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:23:07 -0400 |
To: |
<hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org> |
References: |
tele |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
You're both right, depending upon the audience. My Win98 PII 400 with IE5
and a cable connection can download a 200Kb web page in 5 seconds. My
laptop, using a 56k...well...
My Linux box, with NN, doesn't catch all the goodies from the fancy add-ons,
and since I am usually just looking for content with that machine, I'm not
interested. But, I am also not a normal customer...:).
US customers, especially, are used to TV...and TV means visual effects. The
best approach is probably the most often repeated one: code for your
customers. As coders, we need to understand the code...but don't turn a
deaf ear to the salespeople, who may understand the market...
WAP means text, TV means visual glitz, and the Web will cater to *both*
extremes, and to VR applications we can barely imagine today...:).
D
----- Original Message -----
From: Rebecca Jean Pedersen <rjp(at)mail.tele.dk>
I've been doing a lot of research in the past few days about fonts and
various browsers and systems and I've come up with the conclusion that
there are very few consistencies. So I am left with the question of "Is
it worth it?" Is it worth it to get into CSSs and setting fonts when my
choices are down to about 3 (if I remember correctly, Times, Arial, and
Helvetica) that really work everywhere. I want pages to be consistent
and I'm very anti "optimized for ..." or "best viewed in ...". My
husband tells me I won't get any customers for my webpages if I don't
starting doing all this other stuff but it just clashes with what I
believe in if I make pages that don't work everywhere. (Personally I
prefer a linux system with netscape. Right now he has mostly windows
with IE) So what is the general consensus out there? Are CSSs
essential to a decent marketable page? Do I have to make pages that are
slower than a snail to have any customers?
I hand code everything in emacs. We're getting into PHP and I already
use javascript. I stay away from things requiring plugins because
theyre usually slow. I go for attractive and fast with the theory that
all the fancy stuff in the world won't do any good if no one stays
around long enough to read it. Am I out of my mind?
All comments appreciated. (including ones like my husband's that says a
7th grader could make pages like mine. of course his would probably be
horrendously slow from editor-created junk stuck in there.....)
Thanks!
Rebecca
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA