Re: RE: best body text font size?

by "Paul Wilson" <webguroo(at)tampabay.rr.com>

 Date:  Thu, 4 Oct 2001 09:07:36 -0400
 To:  <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>,
"Kym Jones" <kjones(at)adam.com.au>
 References:  com
  todo: View Thread, Original
> Designing sites which are accessible and as user friendly as possible for
> the disabled is not a matter of personal preference anymore and anyone who
> chooses to fly in the face of the law does so at their own risk I guess.

To my knowledge there is no law that says a civilian website must be
accessable.   Please inform me if I am wrong.  We could make a lot of money
doing redesigns.  This could be like Y2K

The way I understand it, there are standards for websites for the Fed, or
companies that contract to the Fed, and even state websites that are
supported by Fed money.  At this time that's as far as it goes.  I don't
even think there is a serious consideration in Congress to go further than
they have at this time.

The vast majority of the existing websites out there are not compliant. Add
to all these older sites, the SSI driven websites, DHTML menus, Flash,
Shockwave and other technologies that are not really friendly to people with
vision problems.  I am not saying it's morally right, just that this is how
things stand today.

Paul WIlson
webguroo(at)tampabay.rr.com

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.