Re: back to no-margins vs. clean code

    Hi Karen,
    In Nutscrape V 4.08 it looks fine; the only difference is the black
border top & left which is *barely* noticable.
    With all the graphics, though, it takes about 25 seconds to load........
    Believe it or not N. V 3.0 looks good too, except where you used the
menu background as a background image (I assume). V.3.0 dosen't allow bg
images in tables.
    HTH,
    ~ Paul


----- Original Message -----
From: <cbirds(at)earthlink.net>
To: "HWG Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: back to no-margins vs. clean code


> Noteworthy Web Designs hunted and pecked out this message on 5/20/2002
> 9:18 PM
>
> >OK, I've made a CSS change at www.waxstation.com for no margins, and it
> >looks great in IE, but in Netscape 4.7 and Opera, it's not really what I
> >want. I need an opinion, since it's likely that Yahoo editors use
> >Netscape 4.7 (and I DON'T want a discussions on the virtues or lack of
> >for Yahoo!) What do you all think? I wish I could go back to the no
> >margins code:-) It worked in all my browsers.
>
>
> Looks the same to me in both. The right section of the car graphic slips
> down to the second line though, why is that?
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA