Re: IMG tag
by "The Lion's Cub" <lionscub(at)elknet.net>
|
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 17:23:44 -0600 |
To: |
"HWG -- Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
|
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Curious,
I utilized the DTD provided by W3C for 4.01, but now when I use the WDG
validator it cannot read the HTML version. The W3C validator validates just
fine. Does anyone possibly know why that might be?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles A. Upsdell" <chuck(at)upsdell.com>
To: "The Lion's Cub" <lionscub(at)elknet.net>
Sent: January 09, 2000 04:21 PM
Subject: Re: IMG tag
> The NAME attribute is not valid for HTML 4.00, but it is for 4.01. You
> need to validate against the newer DTD.
>
> At 04:53 PM 01/09/00 , you wrote:
> >Ok, I know this probably doesn't seem like a major issue, but I try to
stay
> >as close to the HRML specs as I can. I have a page that uses a mouseover
> >and image preload script. In the image tags in question the script has
the
> >"name=" element. When I try to validate with WDG is shows as an invalid
> >element.
> >
> >My question is is there a way to do mouseover without the name element in
> >the IMG tag. I do not believe there is any real harm in having the name
> >element in the IMG tag but curiosity and being a stickler for details are
> >bad habbits of mine.
> >
> >
>
> -
> Chuck Upsdell, Website Developer
> Email: chuck(at)upsdell.com
> Website: http://www.upsdell.com/
> Browser News: http://www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA