Re: DHTML & CSS update

It depends what you think it means "good stuff".
What "good stuff" means for you might not mean for your page visitors and
you know that their opinion is important.

For example, I've seen a web site of a bank from my country where almost all
the pages use to include over 500 KB (.css, .js, .html, .php, .gif, and .jpg
files) but the useful content of each new page seen was only a few lines.
Maybe the design of those pages is very attractive, I don't know, because I
cannot see them, but even when I was sighted I didn't like to download a lot
of Flash annimations and images just for the pleasure of seeing them.
I was a Flash designer but I didn't like to download Flash annimations, so
it is not important what you like but what your audience does.

Teddy,
Teddy's Center: http://teddy.fcc.ro/
Email: orasnita(at)home.ro

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Kear" <mkear(at)afpwebworks.com>
To: "'Billy Dean'" <billy61(at)earthlink.net>; <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: DHTML & CSS update


The reason this has come about is that I've been in an environment where we
can't use any of the latest good stuff because we're trying to accommodate
all those folks who want to come to the site regardless of what browser they
might have.   We only decided to put our first piece of javascript on the
site a year ago!

Now the political situation has changed a little (internally I mean) and we
can get away with being a little braver, without having a senior manager
coming crying that the sky is falling saying "See! I told you you would be
alienating all our users" if one person complained.

But before I went ahead and designed a site that would include features that
some browsers couldn't see, I thought I'd see what experiences you people
had.

I think it's fair to say that people on this list (or at least as far as you
can say those who responded accurately reflect the opinions of this list)
overwhelmingly think it's time to include DHTML and other newer technologies
if the situation calls for it.  Goodiegoodiegoodie!  I hadn't realised that
you can have a css class that doesn't display, and therefore the contents
will only show for those who don't use css compatible browsers (because I
must have been half asleep when I read that part of the guide!)

By using CSS and DHTML we can have an entirely dynamic site, where merely
adding a category and content to the database, the whole site will
reconfigure, menus, search, sitemap, 'what's new' page and all
automatically.  We can have a web-based Content Management System (CMS) and
it's going to be great!

What we didn't want is to be up to our armpits in work on the CMS, and get
it knocked off the rails by having one or two users complaining because they
can't access everything with their IE3 browser.

Thanks for the advice people, and I'll tell you where the site is when it's
done.



Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org] On
Behalf Of Billy Dean
Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2003 2:04 PM
To: hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
Subject: Re: DHTML & CSS update

It is my opinion that very few designers want to exclude anybody from their
web sites. And you don't have to. It is pretty simple to include code that
gives people with old browsers access to your pages, such as no script, no
frames and so forth. I just don't spend any time trying to accomodate the
idiosyncracies of every browser out there, simply because people cannot or
will not upgrade.

BTW, you can buy a brand new computer with almost all the bells and whistles
for less than $500. I know, because my wife just did...

Billy Dean

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA