Re: HTML - why bother?

For me it seems like a combination of handcoding and wysiwyg programs works
the best. I like being able to layout a site in dreamweaver, and then fine
tune the code when necessary. Knowing HTML makes a huge difference in me
being able to know WHY things look the way they do, and to know what I need
to do to correct something. But I still think the visual editors are great
for getting a site started.

Just my 2 cents,
Dan Katz

----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Goode" <tgoode(at)earthlink.net>
To: "HWG Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org>
Cc: "Nick Doylend" <ndoylend(at)hashishin.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: HTML - why bother?


> Nick,
> I hand coded for years and thought it was the only way to fly like you
> but just now i had to do a fast(rush/rush) quickie update, 5 lines that
> had to catch everyone's attention and get it on the web asap. I pulled
> up my simple composer that comes with my brouser and typed it in and
> through some color and a table on it and BAM! on the web it was. (total
> time was less than 1 minuet).
> Terry G.
>
>
> Nick Doylend wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I need some feedback from the group on this one:  I've created a web
page
> > for a university project by hand coding and I'm trying to justify in my
> > report not using FrontPage (or similar).  The page simply a means to an
end;
> > it's a questionnaire which feeds results into a database.
> >
> >
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA