Re: suggestions needed for table alignment

by "Klaas" <klaas(at)gracegraphics.be>

 Date:  Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:05:11 +0200
 To:  "Kukla Fran and Ollie" <weblists2001(at)yahoo.com>,
"HWG Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>,
"Bart Szyszka" <bart(at)gigabee.com>
 Cc:  "Noteworthy Web Designs" <webmaster(at)noteworthydesigns.com>
 References:  site5
  todo: View Thread, Original
Oh dear,

didn't know this one... width is minimum size... duh... guess that's not
quite okay - though if that's true, it really is about time some browsers
start supporting CSS 2 without quircks (and all in the same way) so we can
then really start designing without any worries.

- Kayjey -


----- Original Message -----
From: Bart Szyszka <bart(at)gigabee.com>
To: Kukla Fran and Ollie <weblists2001(at)yahoo.com>; HWG Techniques
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Cc: Noteworthy Web Designs <webmaster(at)noteworthydesigns.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: suggestions needed for table alignment


> >I've found if you do not make the last cell in a row set to 100% width,
you
> >don't force all the cells to the left of it to be flush left.  Often you
> >then have unaligned images, especially when using multiple tables.
>
> If you make sure the last cell has wrapping content, you won't need that
> hack. The cell will fill in just fine. This is because by the standards
the
> cells are allowed to expand. WIDTH specifies their minimum size, not
> an absolute size.
>
> --
> Bart Szyszka  bart(at)gigabee.com  ICQ:4982727
> GigaBee  ...is here to save the Web!
> http://www.gigabee.com
>
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA