Re: mailto and &
by "Donna M Smillie" <dms(at)zetnet.co.uk>
|
|
----- Original Message -----
From: John Allred <webmaster(at)mscounties.com>
> At the following URL:
>
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424/charset.html#h-5.3.
2
>
> I found this:
>
> "Authors should also use "&" in attribute values since
character references are
> allowed within CDATA attribute values. "
>
> According to this, John's code should validate under HTML 4.0.
So what gives, is
> this a bug in the validator?
But if you read John's original email, you'll see that he said
that it DID validate when he used "&". According to him it
validates but doesn't work when he uses "&" and works but
doesn't validate when he uses just "&".
Regards,
Donna
--
dms(at)zetnet.co.uk
Different Worlds: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/dms/
Pictures of the Past, The Leslie Smith Family,
An Introduction to HTML, Copyright Considerations
Online Bookshop
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA